ao link

You are viewing 1 of your 3 free articles for this month.

UN biodiversity talks ‘fall short’ in securing draft commitments

Campaigners and environmental experts have condemned the UN’s post-2020 global biodiversity framework talks for not going far enough in addressing nature loss, and for failing to agree on key draft targets relating to climate change and food security.

FacebookTwitterLinked InWhatsapp
Chemicals from consumer products have been shown to pose a threat to plant species and wildlife. Photo by Sigmund: Unsplash 
Chemicals from consumer products have been shown to pose a threat to plant species and wildlife. Photo by Sigmund: Unsplash 

It had been hoped that the week-long negotiations in Nairobi in June would enable Parties to reach a consensus on the text of the framework, designed to replace the failed 2011-2020 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity. The framework is due to be finalised at the 15th Conference of Parties (COP15) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Montreal, Canada in December.

 

While the secretariat initially anticipated that the meeting would resolve as much as 80% of the question marks hanging over the framework, only two of 23 targets were finalised.

 

Marco Lambertini, Director General of WWF International, commented: “In the face of catastrophic nature loss and the tragic consequences this is having on humanity, countries are failing to show the necessary urgency – it’s been groundhog day in Nairobi, with all the crucial decisions again kicked down the road.”

 

Lambertini added that negotiators will need “a step-change in political will, attention and ambition” to salvage “text so divided that it will have no chance to be translated into an agreement at the 11th hour in Montreal”. He also accused Brazil of “consistently blocking progress” on the whole framework.

 

Meanwhile, a group of environmental scientists, ecologists and policy experts have jointly submitted a letter to journal Science, in which they claim that the proposed framework fails to account for the totality of chemical pollutants present in ecosystems worldwide. In the letter titled ‘Broaden chemicals scope in biodiversity targets’, the authors write that “the draft agreement falls short by limiting itself to nutrients, pesticides and plastics, while many chemicals of high concern and importance are left out of the equation”.

 

Among the many polluting chemicals that are not currently considered in this agreement are toxic metals such as mercury, persistent pollutants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and chemicals from consumer products, which have been widely shown to pose a threat to humans, wildlife and plant species.

 

An additional meeting has been proposed just before COP15 in December to provide another opportunity for the negotiators to discuss the framework, however this is subject to the availability of funds.

 

During the event’s closing press briefing, CBD executive secretary Elizabeth Mrema urged Parties to “vigorously engage with the text, to listen to each other and seek consensus, and to prepare the final text for adoption at COP15”.

FacebookTwitterLinked InWhatsapp
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
Rachel England

Rachel England

Activate employees

Find out how OckiPro membership engages employees to deliver sustainability impact.

 

More

Get Involved

There are many ways to get involved with Ocki and its community. To find out more, click the button below  

 

Get Involved

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up here to receive Ocki's newsletter, our regular round up of information and activities, delivered to your inbox on the last Friday of every month.
Sign up here to receive Ocki's newsletter, our regular round up of information and activities, delivered to your inbox on the last Friday of every month.
Twitter
Facebook
LInkedIn