ao link

Think tank warns consumers of ‘six shades of greenwash’

Greenwashing might be getting more attention from regulators, but it’s also getting more sophisticated. As a new report shows, practices range from seemingly innocuous strategies that market a product inaccurately, to practices designed to intentionally distract from wider environmental damage.

FacebookTwitterLinked InWhatsapp
Greenwashing six ways. Photo courtesy of Pixaby.
Greenwashing six ways. Photo courtesy of Pixaby.

The term ‘greenwash’ is becoming an increasingly common element of climate and sustainability conversations. In a bid to make their products and services appear more environmentally-friendly than they are, brands and businesses will ‘greenwash’ their messaging to distract from the real impacts of their operations. (Learn more about greenwashing here).

 

Now, financial think tank Planet-Tracker has a released a report that indicates how greenwashing is becoming increasingly sophisticated, and that the practice now comprises at least six different tactics.

 

The report, ‘The Greenwashing Hydra’, identifies greencrowding, greenlighting, greenshifting, greenlabelling, greenrinsing and greenhushing as elements of greenwashing, with each designed to achieve different objectives.

 

According to Planet-Tracker:

  • Greencrowding is where businesses ‘hide in a crowd’ to avoid scrutiny, and rely on safety in numbers.
  • Greenlighting occurs when a company shines the spotlight on one or two particularly favourable environmental practices in order to draw attention away from damaging activities elsewhere.
  • Greenshifting is when companies imply the consumer is at fault for climate challenges and shifts the blame onto them. A good example of this took place in November 2020, when oil company Shell ran a campaign asking people what they were prepared to do to tackle rising carbon emissions.
  • Greenlabelling – perhaps the closest to the ‘traditional’ definition of greenwashing – is where companies use language that implies a product or service is green or sustainable, but closer inspection reveals their words are actually misleading.
  • Greenrinsing refers to a company continually changing its environmental targets before they are achieved. As Planet-Tracker notes, PepsiCo has changed its recycling target three times over the last five years.
  • Greenhushing refers to companies underreporting or hiding their sustainability credentials in order to avoid future scrutiny from consumers, investors and other stakeholders.  

John Willis, director of research at Planet Tracker said that as greenwashing becomes more common it’s important that consumers are aware of its advancing tactics. “Around the world, regulators are starting to confront the growing greenwashing issue. Addressing the problem will require those bodies leading the charge against greenwashing to establish a global equivalence in ESG reporting.”

 

He added: “By identifying the various iterations that greenwashing comes in, we hope to enable investors and consumers to be more mindful when making environmentally-led decisions.”

 

Further reading

Planet-Tracker’s report, The Greenwashing Hydra

 

FacebookTwitterLinked InWhatsapp
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
Rachel England

Rachel England

Activate employees

Find out how OckiPro membership engages employees to deliver sustainability impact.

 

More

Get Involved

There are many ways to get involved with Ocki and its community. To find out more, click the button below  

 

Get Involved

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up here to receive Ocki's newsletter, our regular round up of information and activities, delivered to your inbox on the last Friday of every month.
Sign up here to receive Ocki's newsletter, our regular round up of information and activities, delivered to your inbox on the last Friday of every month.
Twitter
Facebook
LInkedIn