The promise of specially-curated, handpicked garments sent straight to your door is appealing to both fashionistas and the fashion-wary alike, so it’s no surprise clothing subscription services have seen a boon in recent times. But like any other fashion brand, they’ve got a responsibility to tackle the sustainability challenges of their industry. Here’s how the top three UK companies compare.
Coffee, make-up, razors, cheese, stationery… if it can fit in a box, there’s a subscription service for it somewhere. Rising to prominence in 2014 with the market-shaking arrival of cosmetics offering Birchbox, the subscription box model has since exploded in popularity, offering consumers the opportunity to try something new that’s related to their interests, without the hassle of choice paralysis.
The fashion industry has been quick to jump on this trend, with an array of clothing subscription brands promising to take the stress out of style. Sign up, enter your measurements and answer a few questions about your fashion preferences, and every month (or whenever suits you), receive a box of clothing items ‘handpicked’ by stylists (or a fashion algorithm). Keep what you want, send back the rest. Easy.
But it’s common knowledge that the fashion industry is a major social and environmental offender (read more about the problems of fast fashion here). From the mountains of waste it creates to human rights abuses up and down supply chains, brands are increasingly being held accountable for their sustainability efforts (or lack thereof). Fashion subscription services should be no different, in fact, through their relationship with their subscribers, they are uniquely placed to meet the needs of sustainably-conscious consumers.
To see how fashion subscription brands in the UK are responding to these challenges, Ocki contacted the three most popular services offering general clothing subscriptions: Stitch Fix, Lookiero and Dappad. On this occasion, we did not investigate underwear or accessory-only brands.
Our findings are based on information from the brand websites, with each company also sent a list of questions regarding their sustainability practices and given one month to respond. Here’s how they stacked up.
Dappad is an online personal styling shopping boutique for men. According to its website, the company only works with “top quality, affordable luxury and sustainable brands” and handpicks “coordinated outfits from our repertoire of eco and ethically sourced brands”. The styling fee per box is £30, with the average cost of a garment £135.
Yes. Dappad’s spokesperson answered all of our questions comprehensively.
Dappad has a page dedicated to its sustainability values and objectives, here.
Stitch Fix offers personal styling for men and women. According to its website: “It’s our mission to change the way people find clothes they love by combining technology with the personal touch of experienced style experts.” Stitch Fix does this by blending “the human element of personal styling with high-quality clothing and proprietary algorithms”. Each styling fee costs £10 which is redeemable against anything kept. Items range from £30 to £200, and customers that keep everything in their Fix delivery get a 20% discount on their entire purchase.
Its spokesperson did not answer our questions directly, but pointed us in the direction of the Stitch Fix social impact website, here. We replied asking for more in-depth answers regarding our questions, but received no further response.
The social impact site contains extensive information about the company’s sustainability efforts, however it’s not directly accessible from the main consumer-facing Stitch Fix site, nor can it be found via the company’s FAQs.
Lookiero offers personal styling for women. The company’s style experts search over 150 European brands for curated items for each customer according to their size, style and budget preferences. Each styling fee costs £10, which is redeemable against any items kept.
Lookiero’s spokesperson replied to say that the company was “not interesting in participating” in Ocki’s article at this time.
No.
There is no publicly-available information on Lookiero’s sustainability efforts, although in a blog post dated August 2020, the company says: “More and more we’re choosing partners who prioritise sustainability, organic and recyclable fabrics and more responsible ways of working. We even got rid of the plastic wrap from around your box and your prepaid envelope is now made from 100% recycled materials.”
Despite being such a major name in the fashion subscription industry, Lookiero’s performance – based on our findings – is disappointing. From the short snippet gleaned from a 2020 blog post, it sounds like the company is taking at least some action to improve its sustainability credentials. However, with no further information on offer, Lookiero goes to the bottom of the pile.
Stitch Fix, arguably the biggest player in the fashion subscription business, is doing good work in reducing its impact, although some of its main activities – such as recyclable packaging and goals to source more sustainable materials – are what we would expect of any responsible fashion company in 2023. The company is vague in some of its statements – particularly around excess stock and returns – but it is clearly making diversity, equity and inclusion a key priority. The barriers in obtaining the company’s sustainability information – in that its social impact site is not accessible from its main site – is surprising, and we wonder why the brand does not more clearly highlight the work it’s doing in this area.
Finally, Dappad is doing important work in making sustainability a priority, largely by actively addressing the key drivers of fast fashion head-on. While the company does not have the same level of granular sustainability data available as Stitch Fix, its focus on well-made, timeless clothing items made by eco-conscious partners means that fewer of its items are destined for landfill. The company has made some strong commitments to future aims, although we would like to see more hard data to back up its claims – and also a women’s range!
Fashion subscription services hold a special kind of appeal. They eliminate the need to trudge around shops, or spend hours scrolling through websites, and they offer a frisson of excitement with every delivery, giving customers the chance to try something new.
Despite this novel approach, though, the key issues of fashion remain. Subscription services drive consumption by providing new products every month, whether they are needed or not. Materials and resources have been used to create an item which won’t last forever, no matter how much thought has been put into its design. This is less of an issue if you take that item and wear it regularly for a long time, then eventually dispose of it responsibly. But for many, garments are worn once or twice and then banished to the back of the closet or – particularly in the case of poorly-made fast fashion – turfed in the bin. When we carried out this research, none of the brands asked about customers’ environmental or social preferences during the initial sign-up process.
So what’s the alternative? Obviously, people need everyday clothing, which is where sustainably-made, durable items – such as those offered by Dappad – have an important role to play. Then, there’s buying second-hand. Platforms such as Depop and Vinted have exploded in popularity – particularly with younger, eco-conscious consumers. And for special occasions and one-off wears, shoppers can mitigate a lot of the issues of fast fashion by renting an outfit instead of buying one from websites such as The Devout and Hirestreet.
Arguably, however, these platforms don’t offer the same kind of thrill as a fashion subscription box, which is why we’d love to see something like A Curated Thrift arrive in the UK. This US-based clothing subscription service operates just like the ones explored in this article, except all the pieces have been sourced from thrift stores and charity shops. As the perils of fast fashion increasingly come under the spotlight, and our appetite for subscription services grows, it might not be too long before we see a similar service on this side of the pond.
Check it out
|
Find out how OckiPro membership engages employees to deliver sustainability impact.
There are many ways to get involved with Ocki and its community. To find out more, click the button below